Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Death and Euthanasia Essay

Death and Euthanasia Essay Death and Euthanasia Essay The Ethicality of Euthanasia Lindsey Brewer Beckfield College In the medical field, there are countless issues that are highly debated in reference to their ethicality. From stem cell research to health care laws, the topics of discussion spread far and wide. One of the most controversial of these subjects is euthanasia. Euthanasia, defined as the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy, is often called assisted suicide or mercy killing (WEBSTER’S). It is a practice that many are familiar with, but most don’t accept as ethical. Euthanasia is such a multi-faceted issue that it is difficult to decide where to start a discussion about it. The author perceives it to be an ethical dilemma because it involves voluntary death or what some people may term â€Å"playing God.† With Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS), the terminally ill patient’s physician prescribes them a lethal medication to take at their leisure. Essentially, one’s doctor is giving them the chance to end their life, when a doctor’s real job is supposed to be to keep you healthy and alive. This seems like a reversal of duty, but what if the life the person has is not able to be celebrated because of a terminal illness that has wracked their body with pain? It is for this reason that the author thinks euthanasia should be a legal option for terminally ill people. If someone is of sound mind, the author doesn’t see why they shouldn’t be able to make the decision to end their suffering and therefore their life. It’s their right to choose. Having a physician prescribe a medicine they can take on their own terms is a much kinder way to go than committing suicide, which is really the only other option for the terminally ill. By allowing and promoting euthanasia as a choice, it gives them the chance to die with a little dignity. They can even make their final arrangements and plan their death with their loved ones. It gives control to those who don’t have control over their body because of the disease that ravages it. It doesn’t seem fair to me to force someone to live out their life when they are in a constant state of pain and uncertainty. Euthanasia is, in the author’s opinion, a more humane option, but most Americans disagree. According to a Zogby poll, only one third would choose assisted suicide if they were stricken with a terminal disease (ZOGBY). In fact, it is only legal as Physician Assisted suicide and only in five areas in the world, including Washington, Oregon, Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg (LEGAL). The lack of availability highlights how controversial this topic really is, but the author doesn’t think it speaks for how many would choose this route if given the legal option. While the author’s feelings on euthanasia are very strong, most people have opposing views. Some people say euthanasia is murder because someone’s life is being taken before their time. The term â€Å"playing God† is often used because doctors are deciding on when someone will die rather than letting nature take its course. Another reason some feel euthanasia is wrong is because of the potential for those who aren’t terminally ill to request it because they don’t want to live. Current laws under the Oregon and Washington Death with Dignity Act require the person requesting PAS to be of sound mind and suffering from a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months, but what if those laws are amended (DEATH)? Potential for changes to include any persons who just want to cease living is definitely something to fear. While these non-terminally ill patients do have the right to choose to die, the author doesn’t see the laws being modified to include them in the legalization of euthanasia. The author thinks that would cause a much bigger controversy than mercy killing itself. There are many reasons people have views opposite mine in regards to

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Learn How to Conjugate Placer (to Place) in French

Learn How to Conjugate Placer (to Place) in French The French verb  placer means to put or to place. You can imagine how useful this word will be in your French conversations, so a lesson in conjugating the verb will certainly help. By the end, youll be able to use  placer  to say things such as she placed and we are placing. The Basic Conjugations of  Placer French verb conjugations are not always easy because there are many words to memorize and not all verbs follow the regular rules. Unfortunately, placer is a spelling change verb, so it does come with a catch, but its easy to remember if you understand it. For a verb like  placer,  in which the verb stem ends with a  c, there are times when it requires a  Ãƒ §. Youll find this most often in the imperfect past tense, though it can appear anywhere that an  a  or  o  come first on the infinitive ending. This change is necessary to retain the soft  c  sound. Without it, the vowels would make it sound like cat. Beyond that minor issue, you will find that  placer  uses the exact same endings as a  regular -er  verb, which is the most common conjugation pattern found in French. If you already know a few of those words, you can apply the same endings to this verb. Using the chart, you can study the most common indicative mood forms of placer. These include the present, future, and imperfect past tenses, which you will use most often. All you need to do is match the subject pronoun to the appropriate tense for your sentence. For example, I am placing is je place and we will place is nous placerons. Present Future Imperfect je place placerai plaais tu places placeras plaais il place placera plaait nous plaons placerons placions vous placez placerez placiez ils placent placeront plaaient The Present Participle of  Placer The spelling change is also required for placers present participle. Thats because it uses the -ant ending found in many regular verbs. The result is the word plaà §ant. Placer  in the Compound Past Tense Beyond the imperfect, you can also use the  passà © composà ©Ã‚  to indicate the past tense. To form it, you will need two elements: the present tense conjugate of  avoir  and the  past participle  placà ©.  When you put the two together, you get results such as  jai placà ©Ã‚  (I placed) and  nous avons placà ©Ã‚  (we placed). More Simple Conjugations of  Placer Placer  has many conjugations, though well finish this lesson with a few more of its simplest forms. Each has its own use and can be useful additions to your French vocabulary. The subjunctive can help you imply uncertainty to the act of placing. The conditional is useful for times when the action is dependent on something else. You will most likely only find the passà © simple and imperfect subjunctive in written French as these are literary tenses. Subjunctive Conditional Pass Simple Imperfect Subjunctive je place placerais plaai plaasse tu places placerais plaas plaasses il place placerait plaa plat nous placions placerions plames plaassions vous placiez placeriez plates plaassiez ils placent placeraient placrent plaassent The French imperative is used for direct commands and statements and this is the one time when its acceptable to skip the subject pronoun. Instead of tu place, you can say place. Imperative (tu) place (nous) plaons (vous) placez

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Leadership Trends Project Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Leadership Trends Project - Essay Example With due regard to power and significance of reframe, the authors have provided a set of effective learning factors that are primary aspects leading to compel organizations to reframe their managing, controlling and leading functions. In the context of structural frame, the authors have explored the key situations and causes that drive an organization to emphasize reframing decisions. Additionally, the strategy that helps organizations to reframe the increased ability of both leaders and the organizations, have also clearly illustrated in this book. Correspondingly, the authors have also provided a major emphasis regarding the pervasive role of human resource frame while an organization intends towards reframing of its strategic and operational segments. In this context, the discussion encompasses a broad area of research by considering key human resources practices in monitoring and redesigning relationship among the individuals in the organization. Additionally, empowerment is also a major consideration of the book, which have substantially portrayed about the changing roles and responsibilities of the HR personnel in organizations with an increasing focus on reframing. From a political structure perspective, the empirical and evidence based claims of Bolman and Deal (2008) have enabled to understand the impact of power, conflict, competition as well as organizational politics while intending reframing of the processes. And from a symbolic structure perspective, both the authors have illustrated the role of various organizational and environmental metaphors that have major significance on reframing leadership roles as well as strategic performance of the organization while reframing. In this regard, fostering inspiration and creating faith on the defined goals and objectives have also found to a major symbolic aspects that often garner the